Re: [PATCH] of: provide of_platform_unpopulate()
From: Rob Herring <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-21 20:48:15
Also in:
linux-omap, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On 07/21/2013 09:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 07/19/2013 01:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:quoted
So I called of_platform_populate() on a device to get each child device probed and on rmmod and I need to reverse its doing. After a quick grep I did what others did as well and rmmod ended in: | Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000018 | PC is at release_resource+0x18/0x80 | Process rmmod (pid: 2005, stack limit = 0xedc30238) | [<c003add0>] (release_resource+0x18/0x80) from [<c0300e08>] (platform_device_del+0x78/0xac) | [<c0300e08>] (platform_device_del+0x78/0xac) from [<c0301358>] (platform_device_unregister+0xc/0x18) The problem is that platform_device_del() "releases" each ressource in its tree. This does not work on platform_devices created by OF becuase they were never added via insert_resource(). As a consequence old->parent in __release_resource() is NULL and we explode while accessing ->child. So I either I do something completly wrong _or_ nobody here tested the rmmod path of their driver.Wouldn't the correct fix be to call insert_resource somehow? The problem I have is that while of_platform_populate is all about parsing the DT and creating devices, the removal side has nothing to do with DT. So this should not be in the DT code. I think the core device code should be able to handle removal if the device creation side is done correctly. It looks to me like of_device_add either needs to call platform_device_add rather than device_add. I think the device name setting in platform_device_add should be a nop. If not, a check that the name is already set could be added.
BTW, it looks like Grant has attempted this already:
commit 02bbde7849e68e193cefaa1885fe0df0f03c9fcd
Author: Grant Likely [off-list ref]
Date: Sun Feb 17 20:03:27 2013 +0000
Revert "of: use platform_device_add"
This reverts commit aac73f34542bc7ae4317928d2eabfeb21d247323. That
commit causes two kinds of breakage; it breaks registration of AMBA
devices when one of the parent nodes already contains overlapping
resource regions, and it breaks calls to request_region() by device
drivers in certain conditions where there are overlapping memory
regions. Both of these problems can probably be fixed, but it is better
to back out the commit and get a proper fix designed before trying
again.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [off-list ref]
Rob