Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] wlcore: set irq_flags in the board files instead of hiding behind a quirk
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-03 15:12:49
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-wireless, lkml
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Luciano Coelho [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 17:03 +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:quoted
The platform_quirk element in the platform data was used to change the way the IRQ is triggered. When set, the EDGE_IRQ quirk would change the irqflags used and treat edge trigger differently from the rest. Instead of hiding this irq flag setting behind the quirk, have the board files set the flags during initialization. This will be more meaningful than driver-specific quirks when we switch to DT. Additionally, fix missing gpio_request() calls in the boarding files (so that setting the flags actually works). Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <redacted> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <redacted> ---[...]quoted
@@ -5928,16 +5927,21 @@ static void wlcore_nvs_cb(const struct firmware *fw, void *context) wlcore_adjust_conf(wl); wl->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); - wl->platform_quirks = pdata->platform_quirks; wl->if_ops = pdev_data->if_ops; - if (wl->platform_quirks & WL12XX_PLATFORM_QUIRK_EDGE_IRQ) - irqflags = IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING; - else - irqflags = IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT; + irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(wl->irq); + if (!irq_data) { + wl1271_error("couldn't get irq data for irq %d\n", wl->irq); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out_free_nvs; + } + + wl->irq_flags = irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_data);BTW, there seems to be a patch on its way to make reading the flags easier (ie. no need to get the irq_data first): http://mid.gmane.org/1367945288-5625-1-git-send-email-javier@dowhile0.org I'm not sure if this is going to be taken in, but if it does, it would be nice to change the code here to use the new irq_get_trigger_type() function. -- Luca.
Hi Luca
That patch has been already merged in Linus tree as commit 1f6236bf
("genirq: Add irq_get_trigger_type() to get IRQ flags").
So yes, it would be better if you can use irq_get_trigger_type()
instead calling irq_get_irq_data() + irqd_get_trigger_type().
Best regards,
Javier