Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: add AM33XX MMC support
From: Joel A Fernandes <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-14 23:43:51
Also in:
linux-mmc, linux-omap
Felipe, On Friday, June 14, 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi, On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:54:33PM -0500, Joel A Fernandes wrote:quoted
Hi Tony, Vaibhav,quoted
quoted
I just doublechecked MMC rootfs on bone and evmsk as it's the standard smoke test. My EVM is intermittent now so trying to coax it to powerupquoted
quoted
quoted
to reverify.Matt, Your branch is working for me, I tested it on EVM. Not sure what iswrong with manual rebasingquoted
quoted
I did yesterday. I will try to nail-down root-cause here. And you can submit the next version fixing the comments I have given.The only comment I could find in the whole discussion was adding of the interrupts property. I tested I don't have any problem booting with Matt's patch, without having the interrupts property.might very well be, but we want to figure out why adding "intrrupts" causes issues. Why does it have to come through hwmod ? You might have uncovered a real problem which needs fixing. Besides, at the end of the
No actually I think I wasn't very descriptive in my post. There is no problem here. Whether it comes from DT or not, it works in both cases . (I haven't tried adding interrupt node to dts but what I gathered from Vaibhav's post is that it works also when added to dts) But I can revisit Vaibhav's suggestion of adding it to dts for completeness sake. My tree currently works and picks up the interrupt info from hwmod. I just didn't see any activity on this thread for a while so I thought of enquiring it was ok to pull it in for the 3.11 merge window or if the consensus was that interrupt node be added to dts even though it works without it. Thanks, -Joel
day, we want to remove the redundant hwmod data if we already have DTS bindings covering the same requirements. -- balbi