Hi Sascha,

On 4 March 2013 08:53, Sascha Hauer [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:37:52PM +0100, Javier Martin wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Javier Martin <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
index 4c1d1e4..0b9664a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c

@@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ int __init mx27_clocks_init(unsigned long fref)
      clk_register_clkdev(clk[nfc_baud_gate], NULL, "imx27-nand.0");
      clk_register_clkdev(clk[vpu_baud_gate], "per", "coda-imx27.0");
      clk_register_clkdev(clk[vpu_ahb_gate], "ahb", "coda-imx27.0");
+     clk_register_clkdev(clk[sahara_ahb_gate], "ahb", "sahara-imx27.0");
+     clk_register_clkdev(clk[sahara_ipg_gate], "ipg", "sahara-imx27.0");

One of the first patches I want to push upstream for the next merge
window is this one:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1817741/

So the change above becomes unnecessary

Very good. Then this patch can be safely dropped.

-- 
Javier Martin
Vista Silicon S.L.
CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345
Avda de los Castros s/n
39005- Santander. Cantabria. Spain
+34 942 25 32 60
www.vista-silicon.com