Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2013-02-03

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iio: Add OF support

From: Guenter Roeck <hidden>
Date: 2013-02-03 16:31:24
Also in: linux-iio

On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 12:29:23PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 02/03/2013 03:06 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:30:24AM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
quoted
Hi Guenter,

Some comments inline.

On Saturday 02 of February 2013 16:59:40 Guenter Roeck wrote:
quoted
Provide bindings and parse OF data during initialization.

Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <redacted>
---
- Documentation update per feedback
- Dropped io-channel-output-names from the bindings document. The
property is not used in the code, and it is not entirely clear what it
would be used for. If there is a need for it, we can add it back in
later on.
- Don't export OF specific API calls
- For OF support, no longer depend on iio_map
- Add #ifdef CONFIG_OF where appropriate, and ensure that the code still
builds if it is not selected.
- Change iio_channel_get to take device pointer as argument instead of
device name. Retain old API as of_iio_channel_get_sys.
- iio_channel_get now works for both OF and non-OF configurations.

 .../devicetree/bindings/iio/iio-bindings.txt       |   76 ++++++++
 drivers/iio/inkern.c                               |  186
++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 262 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/iio-bindings.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/iio-bindings.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/iio-bindings.txt new file mode
100644
index 0000000..58df5f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/iio-bindings.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+This binding is a work-in-progress. It is derived from clock bindings,
+and based on suggestions from Lars-Peter Clausen [1].
+
+Sources of IIO channels can be represented by any node in the device
+tree.  Those nodes are designated as IIO providers.  IIO consumer
+nodes use a phandle and IIO specifier pair to connect IIO provider
+outputs to IIO inputs.  Similar to the gpio specifiers, an IIO
+specifier is an array of one or more cells identifying the IIO
+output on a device.  The length of an IIO specifier is defined by the
+value of a #io-channel-cells property in the clock provider node.
+
+[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=135902119507483&w=2
+
+==IIO providers==
+
+Required properties:
+#io-channel-cells: Number of cells in an IIO specifier; Typically 0 for
nodes +		   with a single IIO output and 1 for nodes with multiple
+		   IIO outputs.
+
+For example:
+
+    adc: adc@35 {
+	compatible = "maxim,max1139";
+	reg = <0x35>;
+        #io-channel-cells = <1>;
+    };
+
+==IIO consumers==
+
+Required properties:
+io-channels:	List of phandle and IIO specifier pairs, one pair
+		for each IIO input to the device.  Note: if the
+		IIO provider specifies '0' for #clock-cells, then
+		only the phandle portion of the pair will appear.
+
+Optional properties:
+io-channel-names:
+		List of IIO input name strings sorted in the same
+		order as the io-channels property.  Consumers drivers
+		will use io-channel-names to match IIO input names
+		with IIO specifiers.
+io-channel-ranges:
+		Empty property indicating that child nodes can inherit named
+		IIO channels from this node. Useful for bus nodes to provide
+		and IIO channel to their children.
+
+For example:
+
+    device {
+        io-channels = <&adc 1>, <&ref 0>;
+        io-channel-names = "vcc", "vdd";
+    };
+
+This represents a device with two IIO inputs, named "vcc" and "vdd".
+The vcc channel is connected to output 1 of the &adc device, and the
+vdd channel is connected to output 0 of the &ref device.
+
+==Example==
+
+	adc: max1139@35 {
+		compatible = "maxim,max1139";
+		reg = <0x35>;
+		#io-channel-cells = <1>;
+	};
+
+	...
+
+	iio_hwmon {
+		compatible = "iio-hwmon";
+		io-channels = <&adc 0>, <&adc 1>, <&adc 2>,
+			<&adc 3>, <&adc 4>, <&adc 5>,
+			<&adc 6>, <&adc 7>, <&adc 8>,
+			<&adc 9>, <&adc 10>, <&adc 11>;
+		io-channel-names = "vcc", "vdd", "vref", "1.2V";
+	};
diff --git a/drivers/iio/inkern.c b/drivers/iio/inkern.c
index b289915..d48f2a8 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/inkern.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/inkern.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>

 #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
 #include "iio_core.h"
@@ -92,6 +93,179 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec
 	return chan;
 }

+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+
+static int iio_dev_node_match(struct device *dev, void *data)
+{
+	return !strcmp(dev->type->name, "iio_device") && dev->of_node == 
data;

Hmm, do you need to check type name here? One device node should rather 
represent only one device, making node an unique identifier.

It this is meant to be a sanity check, it could be done one time after 
finding the device.
Hi Tomasz,

This is what Lars had suggested earlier:
quoted
Yes, use bus_find_device on iio_bus_type. A nice example how to use this to
lookup device by of node is of_find_i2c_device_by_node. For IIO you also need
to make sure that dev->type is iio_dev_type, since both devices and triggers
are registered on the same bus.
Is it really needed, or in other words would it be sufficient to check if
of_node and data match each other ? Your reasoning makes sense to me, and I had
thought about it as well, but I don't really know, and I don't know how I could
test it and guarantee correctness either. I'll be happy to take the strcmp() out
if someone tells me that it is definitely not needed ...
A IIO trigger and a IIO device may have the same of_node, e.g. if they both
belong to the same physical device. But you don't need to do the strcmp just
compare dev->type to iio_dev_type i.e. dev->type == &iio_dev_type. Although it
doesn't really matter in practice first check for the of_node then check for
the type, since the of_node will only match for a few devices at most, the type
will match for quite a few.
iio_dev_type is defined as static variable in industrialio-core.c, which can be
loaded as module. To use it in inkern.c, I would have to move it there and make
it global. I can do that, but is it worth it just to safe the strcmp ?

Thanks,
Guenter
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help