RE: [PATCH v2 2/3] mmc: davinci_mmc: add DT support
From: Manjunathappa, Prakash <hidden>
Date: 2013-02-08 06:25:45
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mmc, lkml
Hi Mark, On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 16:16:56, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hello, I have a couple of comments on the dt bindings and the way it's parsed.
Thanks for your review comments.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 07:57:04AM +0000, Manjunathappa, Prakash wrote:quoted
Adds device tree support for davinci_mmc. Also add binding documentation. Tested in non-dma PIO mode and without GPIO card_detect/write_protect option because of dependencies on EDMA and GPIO module DT support. Signed-off-by: Manjunathappa, Prakash <redacted> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: cjb@laptop.org Cc: Sekhar Nori <redacted> Cc: mporter@ti.com --- Since v1: Modified DT parse function to take default values and accomodate controller version in compatible field. .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt | 30 ++++++++ drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6717ab1 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +* TI Highspeed MMC host controller for DaVinci + +The Highspeed MMC Host Controller on TI DaVinci family +provides an interface for MMC, SD and SDIO types of memory cards. + +This file documents the properties used by the davinci_mmc driver. + +Required properties: +- compatible: + Should be "ti,davinci-mmc-da830": for da830, da850, dm365 + Should be "ti,davinci-mmc-dm355": for dm355, dm644x + +Optional properties: +- bus-width: Number of data lines, can be <4>, or <8>, default <1> +- max-frequency: Maximum operating clock frequency, default 25MHz. +- mmc-cap-mmc-highspeed: Indicates support for MMC in high speed mode +- mmc-cap-sd-highspeed: Indicates support for SD in high speed modeI thought the last two were derivable from max-frequency?
Yes, but I see below comment that it doesnot support MMC/SD.
arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices.c: davinci_setup_mmc
"
* FIXME dm6441 (no MMC/SD), dm357 (one), and dm335 (two) are
* not handled right here ...
*/"
I was wondering how do we support such platforms, so I thought it is necessary
to have these. But I see that on da850-evm even on skipping above flags EVM is able
to detect card, does it mean there is no way to specify "no SD/MMC" capability?
I will remove these and decide highspeed capability based on max-frequency.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/15/231 [...]quoted
+static struct davinci_mmc_config + *mmc_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev) { + struct device_node *np; struct davinci_mmc_config *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data; + const struct of_device_id *match = + of_match_device(of_match_ptr(davinci_mmc_dt_ids), &pdev->dev); + u32 data; + + np = pdev->dev.of_node; + if (!np) + return pdata; + + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pdata) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to allocate memory for struct davinci_mmc_config\n"); + goto nodata; + } + + if (match->data) + pdata->version = (u8)((int)match->data); + + of_property_read_u32(np, "max-frequency", &pdata->max_freq); + if (!pdata->max_freq) + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "'max-frequency' property not specified, defaulting to 25MHz\n"); + + if (of_get_property(np, "mmc-cap-mmc-highspeed", NULL)) + pdata->caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED; + if (of_get_property(np, "mmc-cap-sd-highspeed", NULL)) + pdata->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED;If these aren't derivable from max-frequency, you could use of_property_read_bool to make this clearer.
Correct, I will decide these based on max-frequency.
quoted
+ + of_property_read_u32(np, "bus-width", &data); + switch (data) { + case 0:Judging by the binding doc, should this be 1 rather than 0?
By default driver comes up in 4 bit mode when bus-width is not specified. Bus-width is set to 1 bit for invalid bus-widths. Below are the cases when bus-width 0 or 4, bus-width is set to 4bit mode When bus-width is 8, bus-width is set to 8 bit mode I thought that if somebody specifies bus-width as 2, 3, 5, 6, 7..., then it should be defaulted to 1 bit mode, so I specified it as 1 bit in binding doc. But I feel that a person who is editing dts file will not make such a mistake. I will change binding document to default as 4 bit mode.
quoted
+ case 4: + case 8: + pdata->wires = data; + break; + default: + pdata->wires = 1; + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported buswidth, defaulting to 1 bit\n"); + } +nodata: + return pdata; +} + +static int __init davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct davinci_mmc_config *pdata = NULL; struct mmc_davinci_host *host = NULL; struct mmc_host *mmc = NULL; struct resource *r, *mem = NULL; int ret = 0, irq = 0; size_t mem_size; + pdata = mmc_parse_pdata(pdev); + if (pdata == NULL) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can not get platform data\n"); + return -ENOENT; + } + /* REVISIT: when we're fully converted, fail if pdata is NULL */This comment can presumably disappear judging by the lines above?
Agreed. I will remove it. Thanks, Prakash