On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:24:11PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Monday 14 January 2013, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

It certainly sounds like a less complicated way to do it. But it also
involves adding a function with a made up name and drop a function with
a perfectly good name instead. I wouldn't even know what name to choose
for the new API.

How about devm_ioremap_resource()? Sounds equally fitting, and is shorter.

2 cents, I wrote back then:

* the new function is not named 'devm_ioremap_resource' because it does more than
  just ioremap, namely request_mem_region. I didn't want to create implicit
  knowledge here.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |