On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 07:21:30PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:

On 12/13/2012 11:41 AM, Will Deacon wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:43:05PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:

quoted

Adds a device-tree binding for the ARM Cross Trigger Interface (CTI).
The ARM Cross Trigger Interface provides a way to route events between
processor modules. For example, on OMAP4430 we use the CTI module to
route PMU events to the GIC interrupt module.

Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cti.txt |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cti.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cti.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cti.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4a0e2d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cti.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+* ARM Cross Trigger Interface (CTI)
+
+The ARM Cross Trigger Interface provides a way to route events between
+processor modules. For example, debug events from one processor can be
+broadcasted to other processors. The events that can be routed between
+processors are specific to the device.
+
+Required properties:
+
+- compatible:			Should be "arm,primecell".
+- interrupts:			Interrupt associated with CTI module.
+- reg:				Contains timer register address range (base
+				address and length).
+- arm,cti-name:			A unique name for the CTI module, that will be
+				used when requesting the CTI module instance.
+
+
+Optional properties:
+
+- arm-primecell-periphid:	Primecell peripheral ID associated with CTI
+				module.

For multi-cluster systems, I wouldn't be surprised to see multiple CTI
instances, each with different CPU affinities. Can we include an affinity
property following Mark's proposed binding?

  http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-December/137290.html

Yes I can take a look. Would something like that be applicable to pmu as
well or is that unlikely to have different affinities? I am just
wondering if there is something that we should implement in general for
the various primecell components.

Do you mean for describing the PMU's affinity to the perf subsystem or its
wiring to the CTI?

It's certainly applicable for the former; I've been working on a series to
enable support for the PMUs in both clusters in a A15x2 A7x3 coretile using the
binding, and I intend to post a series shortly. I'm not sure about the latter,
as I don't have much of an understanding about the CTI.

I'm not sure how many other components have affinity concerns, but the
intention is for the binding to be reusable.

Cheers
Jon

Thanks,
Mark.