Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling USB 3.0 phy for samsung-usbphy driver
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-12-18 23:32:44
Also in:
linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On 12/18/2012 04:39 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Adding base address information required for enabling USB 3.0 DRD phy on exynos5250 SOC. Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam<redacted> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index bbdb2c2..07b7477 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi@@ -316,7 +316,8 @@ usbphy@12130000 { compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-usbphy"; - reg =<0x12130000 0x100>; + reg =<0x12130000 0x100>, + <0x12100000 0x100>;
Doesn't this second memory region mean distinct PHY controller device ? Why separate usbphy node can't/shouldn't be created for it ?
samsung,usb-phyhandle =<&phy_h0&phy_h1&phy_h2>; samsung,enable-mask =<1>; };