On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:31:36PM +0000, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
On 11/21/2012 01:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:22:51PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
Sorry, my mistake (I was thinking on my feet) since secondary_startup is
declared in a C file, right? How about:
ldr lr, =secondary_startup
b ll_set_cpu_coherent
Why? Do we really want LR to be the _virtual_ address? No we don't,
because secondary_startup expects to be called with the MMU off.
So I go back to my original comment. What's wrong with:
bl ll_set_cpu_coherent
b secondary_startup
?
Nothing wrong, it works perfectly.
Whereas indeed the code proposed by Will didn't work very well.
I will take Russell's suggestion.
Fine by me. Somehow I thought this was jumping into C but it's actually way
earlier than that.
Sorry for the confusion,
Will