Re: [PATCH -next] iio: isl29018: fix to return error or 0 in isl29018_write_raw()
From: Jonathan Cameron <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-17 10:20:36
Also in:
linux-iio
On 11/08/2012 09:05 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun <redacted> We had assigned the return value to 'ret' but ignored it when return from isl29018_write_raw(), it's better to return 'ret' instead of 0. dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch. (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
Thanks - merged to togreg branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <redacted> --- drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c b/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c index 3b03f6f..1d5b294 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static int isl29018_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, } mutex_unlock(&chip->lock); - return 0; + return ret; } static int isl29018_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, --To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html