Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2012-11-15

Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: Add simple poweroff-gpio driver

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-15 10:35:36
Also in: linux-arm-kernel

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Stephen Warren [off-list ref] wrote:
On 11/12/2012 11:43 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
quoted
Should the gpio driver fix its bindings then?.. Polarity is a quite
generic concept of a GPIO, and flags are there for a reason. I'd rather
prefer having
There is no "GPIO driver" to fix; each GPIO driver has its own bindings,
and unfortunately, some of the GPIO binding authors chose not to include
any flags cell in the GPIO specifier (e.g. Samsung ARM SoCs IIRC, but
there are probably more).
So can I read this something like we have been too liberal with the
GPIO DT bindings and they are now a bit messy and need to be shaped
up? I don't know how to achieve that :-(

Alerting Grant to see if he has something to add on this subject...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help