On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:23:03 +1100
David Gibson [off-list ref] wrote:
Hrm. The patch comment shows a lot of sparse warnings, but the patch
looks like the basic conversion of the code from uint32_t to
annontated fdt32_t types.
not sure what you're getting at: isn't this to be expected? Anyway,
I'm going to guess you mean to re-word the commit message.
I also never saw a 3/4. Has something gone
wrong with the patch sending?
I sent 3/4 in reply-to your comments on v1 of the patch, and the
rest without the reply-to reference, so 3/4 might show up out of
order in your inbox, depending on how it's configured. I'll send
the entire series with the same reference - jdl's comments to v2 -
instead next time.
Kim