Hi,


On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Felipe Balbi [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 07:23:12PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:

quoted

Hi Balbi,


On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Felipe Balbi [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:12:36PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:

quoted

This patchset is based on the work by Praveen Paneri for
samsung-usbphy driver:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/12653

Changes from v2:
 - Using "EXYNOS5_PHY_" as common prefix along with exact names for
   PHY SFRs for register definitions
 - Using register names with bit macros to make things more clear.
 - Removed parentheses around 0x230 in definition for EXYNOS5_USB_CFG
   in [patch 2/4 v2].

Tested on smdk5250 target with usb-next branch along with arch patches
for exynos5250:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/13042
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/13048

Vivek Gautam (4):
  usb: phy: samsung: Add host phy support to samsung-phy driver
  ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling samsung-usbphy driver
  USB: ehci-s5p: Add phy driver support
  USB: ohci-exynos: Add phy driver support

I really don't know what to do with this series. I know it depends on
the other PHY changes which I have in my queue, but it touches too much
arch specific code, plus the USB Host code which I don't maintain.

True, that it has dependency on the work by Praveen Paneri for

samsung-usbphy

quoted

driver plus the arch support patches.

This is based on usb-next branch, so the host-code can be taken care of ?

quoted

On top of all that, I have no platform to test these patches, which
makes me even more worried about signing off under this series ;-)

The patches have however been tested. The two patches:
"USB: ehci-s5p: Add phy driver support",
"USB: ohci-exynos: Add phy driver support" have been acked by Jingoo Han
based on the patch-series.

Possibly Kukjin Kim can help on this one.

Kukjin,
Can we have a thought on this please.

quoted

Would it be ok if we delay this to v3.9 ? At least the dependency with
other PHY changes would be dropped by then.

This changes are almost in shape ;-) and i am updating the next patchset

soon.

quoted

If possible can we try to get this in 3.8 please. :-)

we can try, but I'd like to minimize the amount of code outside of
drivers/usb/ I take in my tree. If there's any way to split the series
so it makes my life easier, I'd be really glad.

Thanks for this.
I have submitted v4 patch-set in this series:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg73977.html
This again contains some arch changes. I can minimize the arch support as
far as possible.
Possibly i can put up following changes further in v4.
 - Remove arch changes from [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Update & move
usb-phy types to generic include layer

Small arch changes in [PATCH 2/5] usb: phy: samsung: Add host phy support
to samsung-phy driver,
in the same series (i missed v4 suffix in this :-( comes as a result of
Praveen Paneri's patches
in the series http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg73518.html, to
prevent build-break.

Kukjin can help Ack-ing with [PATCH v4 3/5] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling
samsung-usbphy driver, since
this is machine specific patch.

Will this be fine ? Please suggest.

Also, I can't apply arch/* patches without proper Acked-bys, so Kukjin
would need to help us out there too :-)

cheers

--
balbi

-- 
Thanks & Regards
Vivek