Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-gpio: fix issue when DT node greater than 1
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-15 05:55:30
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-i2c
On 10:59 Mon 15 Oct , Bo Shen wrote:
Hi Jean Delvare, On 10/10/2012 10:54, Bo Shen wrote:quoted
Hi Jean Delvare, On 9/19/2012 23:54, Jean Delvare wrote:quoted
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:28:04 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:quoted
On 09/18/2012 07:15 PM, Bo Shen wrote:quoted
I add the debug info, and it give the following error without this patch. --<8---------------------------------- adap->name = i2c-gpio-1 i2c-gpio i2c.2: using pins 30 (SDA) and 31 (SCL) adap->name = i2c-gpio-1 i2c-gpio: probe of i2c.3 failed with error -16 -->8---------------------------------- With this patch, it successfully registered. --<8---------------------------------- adap->name = i2c-gpio0 i2c-gpio i2c.2: using pins 30 (SDA) and 31 (SCL) adap->name = i2c-gpio1 i2c-gpio i2c.3: using pins 90 (SDA) and 91 (SCL) -->8----------------------------------Yes, that explains why the registration fails, but not why this patch is the correct solution to the problem. The problematic code appears to be: snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name), "i2c-gpio%d", pdev->id); Instead, I think that should be something more like: adap->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);strlcpy(adap->name, dev_name(&pdev->dev), sizeof(adap->name)) if anything, as adap->name is a buffer, not a pointer.I am sorry for late. I have tested with DT, it works. Please send this patch to fix the issue. Thanks.Ping? Will you send this patch? Or, I send this patch and add your S.O.B, which do you prefer?
do it Best Regards, J.