On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:43:20PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/08/2012 05:50 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted
On Sunday 07 October 2012 03:53:02 Domenico Andreoli wrote:
quoted
From: Domenico Andreoli <redacted>
System timer implementation for the BCM476x SoCs.
quoted
quoted
Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm476x.dtsi
quoted
quoted
+ timer {
+ compatible = "brcm,bcm476x-system-timer";
+ reg = <0xba000 0x1000>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&vic0>;
+ interrupts = <4>, <11>;
+ clock-frequency = <24000000>;
+ };
This should rather be timer: timer@ba0000 for this node to be uniquely named.
I only see 1 timer node in this series, so "timer" is already unique,
isn't it?
I don't mind to add the address, this SoC actually has three timer blocks.
Dome