Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2012-10-30

Re: [RFC PATCH] dt: describe base reset signal binding

From: Mike Turquette <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-29 18:32:45
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

Quoting Stephen Warren (2012-10-23 14:45:56)
What do people think of this? Does it sound like a good idea to go ahead
with a reset subsystem? Should we simply add a new API to the common clock
subsystem instead (and assume that reset and clock domains match 1:1).
Should this be implemented as part of the generic power management domains;
see include/linux/pm_domain.h instead?
Hi Stephen,

I'm not sure a "reset subsystem" is necessary, but I also do not like
using clocks as the keys for IP reset.  I think it is more common to map
IPs to struct device, no?

And of course for clocks shared by multiple users this will not scale.

Regards,
Mike
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help