Re: [RFC PATCH] dt: describe base reset signal binding
From: Mike Turquette <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-29 18:32:45
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Mike Turquette <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-29 18:32:45
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Quoting Stephen Warren (2012-10-23 14:45:56)
What do people think of this? Does it sound like a good idea to go ahead with a reset subsystem? Should we simply add a new API to the common clock subsystem instead (and assume that reset and clock domains match 1:1). Should this be implemented as part of the generic power management domains; see include/linux/pm_domain.h instead?
Hi Stephen, I'm not sure a "reset subsystem" is necessary, but I also do not like using clocks as the keys for IP reset. I think it is more common to map IPs to struct device, no? And of course for clocks shared by multiple users this will not scale. Regards, Mike