Re: [PATCH V4 REPOST 2/2] kbuild: run the pre-processor on *.dts files
From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-28 02:10:17
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2012-10-27 · Re: [PATCH V4 REPOST 2/2] kbuild: run the pre-processor on *.dts files · Mark Brown <hidden>
- 2012-10-26 · Re: [PATCH V4 REPOST 2/2] kbuild: run the pre-processor on *.dts files · Rob Herring <hidden>
- 2012-10-26 · [PATCH V4 REPOST 2/2] kbuild: run the pre-processor on *.dts files · Stephen Warren <hidden>
On 10/27/2012 07:06 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 02:57:50PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
Like I said previously, I think we first need guidelines on what
is and
isn't acceptable use of C preprocessor in dts files.
Didn't we already say that it was just the same rules as for things tht
get included in .S files? Besides for plain .dts files (as opposed to
.dtsi files) it seems like if people break things they get to keep all
the pieces without disrupting other people too much.
Yes, but can we document that. Also, I'd like others with more DT
historical knowledge to weigh in.OK. What's the appropriate file to document that in? I assume you're not just looking for an explanation in the commit description?