Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Aug 22 2012, Stephen Warren wrote:

On 08/22/2012 04:17 AM, Chris Ball wrote:

quoted

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 22 2012, Shawn Guo wrote:

quoted

The following is what I have on my mind.

broken-cd	cd-gpios	implication
-------------------------------------------
no		no		SDHCI CD
no		yes		GPIO CD
yes		no		NO CD / Broken CD
yes		yes		Invalid

yes: property presents
no: property does not present

This matches Mitch's last suggestion exactly -- I think we're all agreed
on these properties now.  The only remaining question is how to handle
the pinctrl for CD in Thomas's case.

Sorry if this has already been mentioned, but I assume the standard
non-removable property overrides any of those, or is invalid in
combination with any of those?

Yes, absolutely.  I'll make sure to explain that in the new version of
the document.  (I think the reason it hasn't been mentioned much in this
thread is that it's already part of the core bindings.)

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   [off-list ref]   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child