Re: [RFC PATCH] dtc: integrate gpp

On 08:17 Thu 05 Jul     , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

On 14:12 Tue 03 Jul     , Stephen Warren wrote:

quoted

On 06/27/2012 03:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:

quoted

On 06/15/2012 12:53 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:

quoted

From: Stephen Warren <redacted>

I figured the easiest way to get named constants into dtc would be to
re-use an existing C pre-processor implemntation. Surprisingly, I could
not find many /good/ possibilities for this. I eventually found one called
gpp. This patch is an extremely quick-and-dirty integration of gpp into
dtc in order to solicit some feedback. What do people think of this
approach in general?

David, Jon,

What do you think of integrating gpp (or is there some alternative that
would be better)? Does it seem a reasonable approach; should I work on
addressing the TODO items I mentioned in the patch, or give up on this?

Are there any comments on this? Thanks.

I'm looking for this too

can we have a clear statement on it?

Stephan can you re send this one

we really need it to have a readable DT

Best Regards,
J.