Hi Laurent,

On 07/26/2012 04:54 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

On Wednesday 18 July 2012 21:53:34 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:

quoted

I think we need a one combined RFC and continue discussions in one thread.

Agreed.

quoted

Still, our proposals are quite different, but I believe we need something
in between. I presume we should focus more to have common bindings for
subdevs that are reused among different host/ISP devices, i.e. sensors and
encoders. For simple host interfaces we can likely come up with common
binding patterns, but more complex processing pipelines may require
a sort of individual approach.

The suspend/resume handling is still something I don't have an idea
on how the solution for might look like..
Instantiating all devices from a top level driver could help, but it
is only going to work when platforms are converted to the common clock
framework and have their clocks instantiated from device tree.

This week I'm out of office, and next one or two I have some pending
assignments. So there might be some delay before I can dedicate some
reasonable amount of time to carry on with that topic.

I unfortunately won't be attending KS this time.

That's bad news :-( I still think this topic should be discussed during KS, I

Yeah, shit happens.. :) I guess -ENOBUDGET this time... I didn't really 
plan early to attend KS, I might be coming to ELCE though. However it's 
a rather distant event and we'll probably get most things settled by 
that time.

expect several developers to be interested. The media workshop might not be
the best venue though, as we might need quite a lot of time.

Until KS let's continue the discussion by e-mail.

OK, thank you for taking time to review the RFCs.

--

Regards,
Sylwester