Re: [RFC PATCH] dtc: integrate gpp

Hi Stephen,

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <
plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On 14:12 Tue 03 Jul     , Stephen Warren wrote:

quoted

On 06/27/2012 03:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:

quoted

On 06/15/2012 12:53 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:

quoted

From: Stephen Warren <redacted>

I figured the easiest way to get named constants into dtc would be to
re-use an existing C pre-processor implemntation. Surprisingly, I

could

quoted

quoted

quoted

not find many /good/ possibilities for this. I eventually found one

called

quoted

quoted

quoted

gpp. This patch is an extremely quick-and-dirty integration of gpp

into

quoted

quoted

quoted

dtc in order to solicit some feedback. What do people think of this
approach in general?

David, Jon,

What do you think of integrating gpp (or is there some alternative that
would be better)? Does it seem a reasonable approach; should I work on
addressing the TODO items I mentioned in the patch, or give up on this?

Are there any comments on this? Thanks.

I'm looking for this too

can we have a clear statement on it?

I'm also looking for this.

I was hoping for first-class symbols in dtc, and I wonder how we deal with
error handling in two places, as well as displaying compile errors in
preprocessed code. But still, I hope that this can go ahead as it much
better than what we have at present (nothing).

Regards,
Simon

Best Regards,
J.

quoted

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss