Re: [RFC PATCH] dtc: integrate gpp
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-05 06:17:40
On 14:12 Tue 03 Jul , Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/27/2012 03:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:quoted
On 06/15/2012 12:53 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:quoted
From: Stephen Warren <redacted> I figured the easiest way to get named constants into dtc would be to re-use an existing C pre-processor implemntation. Surprisingly, I could not find many /good/ possibilities for this. I eventually found one called gpp. This patch is an extremely quick-and-dirty integration of gpp into dtc in order to solicit some feedback. What do people think of this approach in general?David, Jon, What do you think of integrating gpp (or is there some alternative that would be better)? Does it seem a reasonable approach; should I work on addressing the TODO items I mentioned in the patch, or give up on this?Are there any comments on this? Thanks.
I'm looking for this too can we have a clear statement on it? Best Regards, J.
_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss