Thread (63 messages) 63 messages, 11 authors, 2012-08-07

Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] runtime interpreted power sequences

From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-30 15:47:11
Also in: linux-fbdev, linux-tegra, lkml

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:44:29AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On 07/27/2012 07:05 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
quoted
+		power-on-sequence {
+			regulator@0 {
+				id = "power";
+				enable;
What do this mean? Isn't this implied for a regulator?
I assume you might have some sequences which need some things to be
turned off for some reason; it at least seems to be something you'd want
to design for.
This looks like you designed the platform_data structs first and then
came up with device nodes to mirror the struct.
Judging by most of the DT I review this seems idiomatic :)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help