Re: [PATCH 3/4] OMAP: Define TCA6424 max number of possible IRQs

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu
[off-list ref] wrote:

OK, but if your taking this patch through GPIO tree the better if the 4th
patch is taken through it. TCA6424 fails if both the patches are not
present.

If the situation is such they should be squashed into one since the
point after the first before the second patch is not bisectable.

Yours,
Linus Walleij