On 06/29/2012 02:45 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:47:03AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:

quoted

Cc'ed Devicetree Discussions

On 06/29/2012 03:43 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 03:53:48PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:

quoted

This patch allows the device tree to limit the chipidea to host or
peripheral mode only.

Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <redacted>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt        |    3 ++
 drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c                 |    3 ++
 drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c                        |   41 +++++++++++++++++---
 include/linux/usb/chipidea.h                       |    9 +++++
 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt
index 5a0ad66..67f97f56 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt

@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ Required properties:
 - compatible: Should be "fsl,imx27-usb"
 - reg: Should contain registers location and length
 - interrupts: Should contain controller interrupt
+- dr_mode: indicates the working mode for compatible controllers. Can
+  be "host", "peripheral", or "otg". Defaults to "otg" if not defined.

quoted

By default, it should be decided by capability registers. Only bad hw
design needs such settings. So, why not name it as force-xxx? If it's
not specific to imx, it doesn't needs to has prefix "fsl,".

It's not a bad hardware design if you don't route or enable all ports a
soc offers. In modern socs you cannot enable all ports anyway.

I'm not sure about your case, but generally, it's not about ports.
It's about ID pin. If ID pin is not connect correctly, we may need to
force it to host or device working mode. The 'force" here means it
won't follow the capability registers and ID pin.

quoted

The property isn't prefixed with "fsl,", it's just "dr_mode".

Why not "force-xxx"? I had a look at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb:

tegra-usb.txt:

quoted

  - dr_mode : dual role mode. Indicates the working mode for
   nvidia,tegra20-ehci compatible controllers.  Can be "host", "peripheral",
   or "otg".  Default to "host" if not defined for backward compatibility.
      host means this is a host controller
      peripheral means it is device controller
      otg means it can operate as either ("on the go")

fsl-usb.txt:

quoted

 - dr_mode : indicates the working mode for "fsl-usb2-dr" compatible
   controllers.  Can be "host", "peripheral", or "otg".  Default to
   "host" if not defined for backward compatibility.

So why invent something new, if there seems to be a pattern?

I'm not sure they mean the same things, because the default value is
different. Event if they're same, why not make them all with sensible
name?

I'm not quite sure what the question is I'm being asked here.

I certainly think that new bindings should follow existing precedent
where possible for representing the same data. dr_mode is that precedent
for a USB host's operating mode. Tegra chose to use that because of
precedent in fsl-usb.txt IIRC.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html