Re: Tegra DRM device tree bindings
From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-26 17:43:38
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-tegra
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2012-07-08 · Re: Tegra DRM device tree bindings · Thierry Reding <hidden>
- 2012-07-06 · Re: Tegra DRM device tree bindings · Stephen Warren <hidden>
- 2012-07-06 · RE: Tegra DRM device tree bindings · Mark Zhang <hidden>
- 2012-07-05 · Re: Tegra DRM device tree bindings · Thierry Reding <hidden>
- 2012-07-01 · Re: Tegra DRM device tree bindings · Lucas Stach <hidden>
On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:quoted
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
status = "disabled"; gart = <&gart>; /* video-encoding/decoding */ mpe { reg = <0x54040000 0x00040000>; interrupts = <0 68 0x04>; status = "disabled"; };The client device interrupts are not very interesting, so they could be left out, too. Display controller related are probably an exception to this.If the interrupts aren't used at all we should drop them.
I disagree here; "used" is most likely something specific to a particular OS's drivers. The HW always has the interrupts, and hence they should be described in DT.