Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] ARM: tegra: pcie: Add device tree support
From: Arnd Bergmann <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-22 21:08:34
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-tegra
From: Arnd Bergmann <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-22 21:08:34
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-tegra
On Friday 22 June 2012, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Friday 22 June 2012, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:quoted
The requirement (if there is one) isn't anything related to PC-ness. I just don't understand how things can actually work if two host bridges both claim the same bus number. If we do a config read to that bus, both bridges should claim it and turn it into config cycles on their respective root buses, and we should get two responses. I would expect the second response to cause an "unexpected response" machine check or similar.But each PCI domain has its own config space, so if you do a config read for one bus, it's always relative to the domain.Oh, I see! I totally missed the fact that each host bridge was in its own domain. If each has its own domain, then the bus number aperture can certainly be [bus 00-ff] and there's no problem.
Right. On my side, it took me a while to figure out that you can actually have multiple root ports in one domain ;-) Arnd