Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: reform prom_update_property function | linux-devicetree | Ratatoskr

[PATCH 1/1] of: reform prom_update_property function · Dong Aisheng <hidden> · 2012-06-20
Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: reform prom_update_property function · Rob Herring <hidden> · 2012-06-20
Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: reform prom_update_property function · Dong Aisheng <hidden> · 2012-06-20
Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: reform prom_update_property function · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> · 2012-06-21
Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: reform prom_update_property function · Dong Aisheng <hidden> · 2012-06-21
Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: reform prom_update_property function · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> · 2012-06-22
Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: reform prom_update_property function · Dong Aisheng <hidden> · 2012-06-22
Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: reform prom_update_property function · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> · 2012-06-22

Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: reform prom_update_property function

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-22 05:39:39
Also in: lkml

On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 13:25 +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:

Which seems the same behavior as the new prop_update_property api.
The only different is if no name, return -EINVAL;
Am i wrong?

No, you are right. Sorry for the noise :-)

Cheers,
Ben.