On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 22:00 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:57:50 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 11:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
quoted
The pattern (np ? np->full_name : "<none>") is rather common in the
kernel, but can also make for quite long lines. This patch adds a new
inline function, of_node_full_name() so that the test for a valid node
pointer doesn't need to be open coded at all call sites.
s/of_node_full_name/of_node_path ?
It would be nicer to have the shorter name, but the data member is
already named full_name, so I'd rather use the same for the function
name (unless you argue strongly against, it's not something I'm going
to fight about).
Nah, it's just that full_name was never a very good choice to begin
with ... Do as you wish. Renaming the data member might be a bit
annoying I can immagine :-)
Cheers,
Ben.