Re: [PATCH] slimbus: Linux driver framework for SLIMbus.
From: Sagar Dharia <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-06 08:13:34
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, lkml
From: Sagar Dharia <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-06 08:13:34
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, lkml
I understand it is not a 1-to-1 mapping. However it *is* used as such: wbuf[2] = (u8)((segdist & 0xF00) >> 8) | (slc->prop.prot << 4); which results in NEXT_DEFINE_CHANNEL messages with an invalid TP field.
Yes, thanks for catching this. I will make changes to rectify this.
Yes, my mistake. The driver wouldn't have to poll if there was another callback. So I don't see how the completion mechanism is superior: it forces a synchronous interface to asynchronous events, or the driver developer has to work around it.
The get_logical_address API itself doesn't take completion. Completion is part of slim_device structure so that the slim_device's driver can wait on it whenever it needs LA for the first time. (Framework signals completion on a slim_device when it gets enumerated) If callback is preferred, I will change it to callback. Regards- Sagar Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.