Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2012-05-22

Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] usb: chipidea: add imx driver binding

From: Richard Zhao <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-22 10:31:40
Also in: linux-arm-kernel

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 01:06:26PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:56:52PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
quoted
quoted
Do you think it's a good idea to let user select binding driver directly
and the binding driver config depends on chipidea config?
I don't have a strong opinion on this, although I prefer it the way it
is now, because, imo:

  * in case of =m (and that's the only sane way of compiling it anyway),
    these all are compiled as modules, which you simply don't install if
    you don't want them;
  * all of them get compile-tested every time you change something in
    the driver, which is a good thing;
only true for $(ARCH) builds. I would like to see these drivers being
compile tested on linux-next on all arches. Thus the patches I just
sent.
The idea is great. But
- how can I make sure it pass for all arch? There' 27 folder in arch/.
- it's hard to predict one driver depends on what.
- for embedded kernel, people like built-in drivers, and people will
  have things they don't need at all.

Thanks
Richard
-- 
balbi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help