Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2012-05-08

Re: [PATCH 04/14] OF: pinctrl: MIPS: lantiq: implement lantiq/xway pinctrl support

From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-08 15:51:15
Also in: linux-mips

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On 05/08/2012 09:39 AM, John Crispin wrote:
quoted
quoted
I don't think anyone else is going to want to compile
this.
This Kconfig option is selected by the ARCH Kconfig, so only selected at
the right time. The user won't get prompted for it since there's no
string after "bool". I think this is OK. Tegra's pinctrl Kconfig option
doesn't have any "depends ARCH_TEGRA" here either, although I note that
many other pinctrl drivers do.
Hi,

I guess it makes it more apparent, that the symbol is specific to a
arch/soc. Tegra is a well known SoC, so its easy to figure out what the
codes purpose is. Other files might not be that easy to guess.

For the Lantiq SoC to function normally we need to always load these
drivers. PINTCTRL_LANTIQ has some generic functions and
PINTCTRL_LANTIQ_XWAY holds the code specific to the XWAY SoC. (i have a
patch in the local queue to add FALCON SoC support, giving
PINTCTRL_LANTIQ 2 users)

How about we do the following.

config LANTIQ
	select PINCTRL

config PINCTRL_LANTIQ
	def_bool y
	depends on LANTIQ

config PINCTRL_LANTIQ_XWAY
	def_bool y
	depends on SOC_TYPE_XWAY

This would auto select the right symbols, have all the dependency logic
in 1 place and reduce the size of arch/mips/lantiq/Kconfig
Is it useful to build a kernel for XWAY without pinctrl, once the driver
is there? That's the main difference between arch/mips/lantiq/Kconfig
selecting PINCTRL_LANTIQ_XWAY vs that being a def_bool, and hence
allowing the user to deselect it.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help