Re: [PATCH] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver

On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 15:20 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:

quoted

quoted

while ((readl(...))&&  timeout-->  0)
    cpu_relax();

As I understand loops_per_jiffy, this loop will take much longer than
the 100 ms you defined above?

Not sure about much, but longer. The idea is that this is about the
error path so if we report -EIO with a slight delay - no problem.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy