Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2012-04-16

Re: [PATCH v6 17/17] pwm: Take over maintainership of the PWM subsystem

From: Arnd Bergmann <hidden>
Date: 2012-04-16 15:02:32
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-tegra

On Monday 16 April 2012, Thierry Reding wrote:
Seems like this issue is resolved, but something else came up. In the !OF
builds, of_pwm_request() no longer builds because of_property_match_string()
and of_parse_phandle_with_args() have no dummies for !OF. I've posted patches
for these on Friday and they need to go in before the PWM subsystem. I could
also revert the IS_ENABLED() parts and go back to a #ifdef CONFIG_OF but I'd
rather not.
Agreed, using IS_ENABLED from C code is much nicer than #ifdef because
we can be sure that all code actually builds.

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help