Re: EHCI_MV confusion was: Re: kirkwood devicetree respin
From: Alan Stern <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-21 16:27:51
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Alan Stern wrote:quoted
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Jason Cooper wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:54:53PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:quoted
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
ehci-orion only makes sense on PLAT_ORION, and they never have any other platform ehci driver. ehci-mv only makese sense on PLAT_PXA, and they also don't have any other platform ehci driver.BTW, as someone who once was the active maintainer for PXA, and later the active maintainer for Orion, I should say that ehci-mv is a terribly bad name (as demonstrated, not all Marvell SOCs use ehci-mv) and confusion would be much reduced if it was renamed to ehci-pxa.
I think there is still value in the rename. "mv" is a really bad qualifier for an IP block from a company that has many of them for the same purpose.
Then you should discuss this with the driver's maintainer (CC'ed). Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html