Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2012-03-15

Re: [PATCH] ARM: SPEAr600: Add device-tree support to SPEAr600 boards

From: Arnd Bergmann <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-15 13:39:36
Also in: linux-arm-kernel

On Thursday 15 March 2012, Stefan Roese wrote:
On Thursday 15 March 2012 10:00:27 Viresh Kumar wrote:
quoted
On 3/15/2012 2:18 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+static const struct of_device_id vic_of_match[] __initconst = {
+     { .compatible = "arm,pl190-vic", .data = vic_of_init, },
+     { /* Sentinel */ }
+};
+
+static void __init spear6xx_dt_init_irq(void)
+{
+     of_irq_init(vic_of_match);
+}
+
What about adding this routine in vic.c file, which can then be used
by all platforms, instead of replicating this code.
We can't move vic_of_match to the vic.c, since there are differences
between the boards using it. And only moving spear6xx_dt_init_irq()
(renamed of course) doesn't seem worth it.
I knew this. Actually my thought was, we have two compatible strings for
vic: pl190 and pl192.

So, create two vic_of_match* arrays and two vic*_dt_init_irq() routines.
That will solve the issue i believe.
I still don't think its worth it. But please feel free to send an add-on 
patch, to "clean this up".
What's wrong with one vic_dt_init_irq() function and an array with two entries?

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help