On 03/08/2012 11:31 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
* Stephen Warren wrote:
quoted
On 03/08/2012 07:51 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
quoted
This commit adds support for instantiating the Tegra PCIe controller
from a device tree.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/tegra-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/tegra-pcie.txt
quoted
+NVIDIA Tegra PCIe controller
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: "nvidia,tegra20-pcie"
+- reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers
+- interrupts: the interrupt outputs of the controller
+
+Optional properties:
+- pex-clk-supply: supply voltage for internal reference clock
+- vdd-supply: power supply for controller (1.05V)
Mark, Liam,
Should those *-supply properties really be optional? I got the
impression talking to Mark in a different thread that all regulators
should exist, although their implementation may be via a fixed
regulator, with no GPIO, as determined by the board design.
If I read the TrimSlice code correctly, there is no regulator setup required
to make PCIe work there presumably because they hardwire the proper voltages.
Yes. I believe that's exactly what the fixed regulator is for.
On the other hand, maybe a better solution in this case would be to use the
dummy regulator in those cases.
Mark indicated dummy regulators weren't the preferred mechanism:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/25/30