Re: [PATCH 4/8] pinctrl: implement pinctrl_check_ops

[PATCH 1/8] dt: add property iteration helpers · Stephen Warren <hidden> · 2012-03-16
[PATCH 3/8] dt: pinctrl: Document device tree binding · Stephen Warren <hidden> · 2012-03-16
[PATCH 4/8] pinctrl: implement pinctrl_check_ops · Stephen Warren <hidden> · 2012-03-16
Re: [PATCH 4/8] pinctrl: implement pinctrl_check_ops · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2012-03-20
[PATCH 2/8] pinctrl: Include <linux/bug.h> to prevent compile errors · Stephen Warren <hidden> · 2012-03-16
Re: [PATCH 2/8] pinctrl: Include <linux/bug.h> to prevent compile errors · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2012-03-20
[PATCH 6/8] dt: Move Tegra20 pin mux binding into new pinctrl directory · Stephen Warren <hidden> · 2012-03-16
[PATCH 7/8] dt: Document Tegra20/30 pinctrl binding · Stephen Warren <hidden> · 2012-03-16
[PATCH 8/8] pinctrl: tegra: Add complete device tree support · Stephen Warren <hidden> · 2012-03-16
[PATCH 5/8] pinctrl: core device tree mapping table parsing support · Stephen Warren <hidden> · 2012-03-16
Re: [PATCH 5/8] pinctrl: core device tree mapping table parsing support · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2012-03-20
Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt: add property iteration helpers · Rob Herring <hidden> · 2012-03-19
Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt: add property iteration helpers · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-03-20

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-20 12:14:26
Also in: linux-tegra, lkml

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Stephen Warren [off-list ref] wrote:

Most code assumes that the pinctrl ops are present. Validate this when
registering a pinctrl driver. Remove the one place in the code that
was checking whether one of these non-optional ops was present.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <redacted>

Good idea, applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help