Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] MIPS: Octeon: Setup irq_domains for interrupts.
From: David Daney <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-04 05:09:36
Also in:
linux-mips, lkml
On 03/03/2012 11:35 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 03/02/2012 01:29 PM, David Daney wrote:quoted
On 03/02/2012 11:07 AM, Grant Likely wrote:quoted
+static void __init octeon_irq_set_ciu_mapping(unsigned int irq, + unsigned int line, + unsigned int bit, + struct irq_domain *domain, struct irq_chip *chip, irq_flow_handler_t handler) { + struct irq_data *irqd; union octeon_ciu_chip_data cd; irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, chip, handler); - cd.l = 0; cd.s.line = line; cd.s.bit = bit; irq_set_chip_data(irq, cd.p); octeon_irq_ciu_to_irq[line][bit] = irq; + + irqd = irq_get_irq_data(irq); + irqd->hwirq = line<< 6 | bit; + irqd->domain = domain;quoted
quoted
I think the domain code will set these.It is my understanding that the domain code only does this for: o irq_domain_add_legacy() o irq_create_direct_mapping() o irq_create_mapping() We use none of those. So I do it here. If there is a better way, I am open to suggestions.irq_create_mapping is called by irq_create_of_mapping() which is in turn called by irq_of_parse_and-map(). irq_domain always manages the hwirq and domain values. Driver code cannot manipulate them manually.I really must be missing something. Given: 1) I must have a mapping between hwirq and irq that I control so that non-OF code using the OCTEON_IRQ_* constants continues to work.Those defines are what you need to work to get rid of.
We are not starting from a blank slate here. There is a lot of in-tree code using these symbols. We cannot make them disappear with wishful thinking. The first step is a switch to irq_domains using the existing mappings. After we do that, I have patches to transition some drivers to use the OF mapping via irq_domains. After those are merged, we can work toward getting rid of OCTEON_IRQ_*. But I think it must be the last step in the process, not the first.
quoted
2) irq_create_mapping() will allocate a random irq value if none is already assigned to the hwirq. Therefore: To avoid having random irq values assigned, I must manually assign them.So you should be using legacy domain if you need to maintain fixed hwirq to linux irq numbers. "linear" is a bit confusing as it doesn't mean linear 1:1 irq number assignment, but linear search.
My reading of Grant's code in linux-next directly contradicts this statement. There is no code in irqdomain.c, that I can see, that allows me to have an arbitrary mapping of irq <--> hwirq values.
Ultimately, for DT boot you should use of_irq_init to scan the dts, and then create a linear domain for each interrupt controller node. You may need to decide on linear vs. legacy at runtime based on having a DT node pointer or not.
Perhaps, but we need to take the first step before gradually arriving at some Ultimate Solution. We will also need to handle irq controllers with 2^20 sparsely populated hwirq values, so linear domains will probably be out of the question there. David Daney