Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] ARM: at91/aic: add irq domain and device tree support
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-05 18:02:18
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 05:26:48PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
Hi Grant, Thanks for your review. Some answer following... On 01/04/2012 08:40 PM, Grant Likely : [..]quoted
quoted
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/of_irq.h> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h> +#include <linux/err.h> #include <mach/hardware.h> #include <asm/irq.h>@@ -34,22 +38,28 @@ #include <asm/mach/map.h> void __iomem *at91_aic_base; +static struct irq_domain at91_aic_domain; + +static inline unsigned int aic_irq(struct irq_data *d) +{ + return d->hwirq; +}This is a useless macro. Drop it.Ok. That was overkill ;-) [..]quoted
quoted
@@ -90,13 +100,13 @@ static u32 backups; static int at91_aic_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned value) { - if (unlikely(d->irq >= 32)) + if (unlikely(aic_irq(d) >= at91_aic_domain.nr_irq))I don't think you need to derefernce the irq_domain.nr_irq here. Just keep the test for >= 32.Well I would like to keep it referring to this value as we may increase the number of irq handled by this controller in the future... [..]quoted
quoted
+#if defined(CONFIG_OF) +static int __init __at91_aic_of_init(struct device_node *node, + struct device_node *parent) +{ + at91_aic_base = of_iomap(node, 0); + at91_aic_domain.of_node = of_node_get(node); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct of_device_id aic_ids[] __initconst = { + { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-aic", .data = __at91_aic_of_init }, + { /*sentinel*/ } +}; + +static void __init at91_aic_of_init(void) +{ + of_irq_init(aic_ids); +} +#else +static void __init at91_aic_of_init(void) {} +#endif + /* * Initialize the AIC interrupt controller. */ void __init at91_aic_init(unsigned int priority[NR_AIC_IRQS]) { unsigned int i; + int hwirq, irq; - at91_aic_base = ioremap(AT91_AIC, 512); + if(of_have_populated_dt()) + at91_aic_of_init(); + else + at91_aic_base = ioremap(AT91_AIC, 512); if (!at91_aic_base) - panic("Impossible to ioremap AT91_AIC\n"); + panic("Unable to ioremap AIC registers\n"); + + /* Add irq domain for AIC */ + at91_aic_domain.nr_irq = NR_AIC_IRQS; + at91_aic_domain.irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, AIC_BASE_IRQ, + at91_aic_domain.nr_irq, 0); + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(at91_aic_domain.irq_base)) { + WARN(1, "Cannot allocate irq_descs, assuming pre-allocated\n"); + at91_aic_domain.irq_base = AIC_BASE_IRQ; + } + at91_aic_domain.ops = &irq_domain_simple_ops; + irq_domain_add(&at91_aic_domain);Nothing special is being done with the irq domain. Please use irq_domain_add_simple(). It will make things easier for the next round of irq_domain patches that I'm getting ready to post.Fair enough, but I have one question: how do I specify "nr_irq" in the domain created by irq_domain_add_simple()? Maybe it is not needed?
Fix the irq_domain_add_simple() helper to accept a nr_irq parameter. :-) g.