Re: [PATCH 6/6] gpio: tegra: Parameterize the number of banks
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-04 22:00:36
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-tegra
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Warren [off-list ref] wrote:
Rob Herring wrote at Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:54 PM:quoted
On 01/04/2012 12:39 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:quoted
Tegra20's GPIO controller has 7 banks, and Tegra30's controller has 8 banks. Allow the number of banks to be configured at run-time by the device tree....quoted
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_nvidia.txt...quoted
quoted
Required properties: - compatible : "nvidia,tegra20-gpio" - reg : Physical base address and length of the controller's registers. +- nvidia,num-banks : The number of GPIO banks. This should be 7 for + Tegra20 and 8 for Tegra30. This must match the number of interrupt + specifiers in the interrupts property.You can determine the number of banks based on the compatible property rather than needing an additional property.That's certainly possible. However, if say nvidia,tegraNNN-gpio has 9 banks, we then have to explicitly edit the driver to know that, whereas by using a property, we wouldn't have to change the driver at all to support a future GPIO controller. So, isn't it better to explicitly represent this in DT? Note that I have no idea how many GPIO banks our future chips will have, so this might not turn out to save any work at all, but perhaps.
It's an engineering/design decision that requires taste and instinct. Either approach is fine, you decide which one will be the best in the long term. g.