Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 3 authors, 2011-12-15

Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: OMAP2/3: intc: Add DT support for TI interrupt controller

From: Cousson, Benoit <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-08 14:59:50
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap

On 12/7/2011 10:20 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 12/07/2011 02:50 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
[...]
quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+int __init intc_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
+{
+	struct resource res;
+	u32 nr_irqs;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!node))
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	if (of_address_to_resource(node, 0,&res)) {
+		WARN(1, "unable to get intc registers\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,intc-size",&nr_irqs)) {
+		WARN(1, "unable to get intc-size\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
There is no default value that makes sense?
So far we have 96 or 128, so I can put 96 as a default and just keep the 
warning without returning an error.
quoted
+	}
+
+	omap_init_irq(res.start, nr_irqs);
+	irq_domain_add_simple(node, 0);
Have you read the NO_IRQ thread...
Yeah, I tried, but that's a long email thread with some unclear 
conclusion...
The point is that the few users of that API today are using 0 as a base 
as well, so I thought it was still valid.
Is 0 ever a valid interrupt for a driver? If so, you must not use 0 for
the base. I would pick 16 to skip over legacy ISA irqs.
I do not have any 0 interrupts right now, my concern is that I still 
have some legacy non-DT drivers that expect the previous hwirq = irq 
mapping.
irqdomains should always be enabled regardless of CONFIG_OF. So either
you can leave it as is if OF is always enabled for OMAP, or you should
move domain setup into omap_init_irq.
OK, but it looks like I cannot really modify the current INTC to DT 
without having fully adapted the OMAP drivers to use 
irq_of_parse_and_map. Or did I miss something?

Regards,
Benoit
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help