Re: [PATCH 05/14] tegra: fdt: Add Tegra2x device tree file

On 12/01/2011 06:24 PM, Simon Glass wrote:

Hi Stephen,

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Stephen Warren [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 11/23/2011 08:54 PM, Simon Glass wrote:

quoted

This was taken from commit 1ea6b8f at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/olof/tegra.git

...

quoted

In particular, linux-next now includes a minimal USB binding. Should we
just use this in U-Boot for now? We should get review on the kernel
lists before bringing in this more advanced USB binding in U-Boot, and
perhaps even add the binding into the kernel at the same time?

I copied my email to the device-tree mailing list. Hopefully that is
enough to get a review there. It feels wrong to send U-Boot patches to
the kernel list...?

I think the kernel and U-boot need to co-ordinate on the DT bindings.
Posting at least to linux-tegra, the Tegra maintainers, and perhaps even
the kernel's domain-specific list (i.e. linux-usb) seems appropriate to
me. DT is a cross-functional thing, and really needs cross-functional
discussion and review. devicetree-discuss will cover the DT experts, but
probably not the CPU and subsystem experts.

-- 
nvpublic