Re: [PATCH] mach-ux500: add devicetree compat nodes
From: Rob Herring <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-11 16:13:26
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
On 11/11/2011 09:59 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
MACHINE_START(U8500, "ST-Ericsson MOP500 platform") /* Maintainer: Srinidhi Kasagar [off-list ref] */ .boot_params = 0x100,@@ -651,6 +666,7 @@ MACHINE_START(U8500, "ST-Ericsson MOP500 platform") /* we re-use nomadik timer here */ .timer = &ux500_timer, .init_machine = mop500_init_machine, + .dt_compat = mop500_dt_board_compat, MACHINE_END MACHINE_START(HREFV60, "ST-Ericsson U8500 Platform HREFv60+")@@ -659,6 +675,7 @@ MACHINE_START(HREFV60, "ST-Ericsson U8500 Platform HREFv60+") .init_irq = ux500_init_irq, .timer = &ux500_timer, .init_machine = mop500_init_machine, + .dt_compat = hrefv60_dt_board_compat, MACHINE_END MACHINE_START(SNOWBALL, "Calao Systems Snowball platform")@@ -668,4 +685,5 @@ MACHINE_START(SNOWBALL, "Calao Systems Snowball platform") /* we re-use nomadik timer here */ .timer = &ux500_timer, .init_machine = mop500_init_machine, + .dt_compat = snowball_dt_board_compat, MACHINE_ENDThese all look very similar and should be combined. Why do you not have 1 machine for all DT platforms as other SOCs are doing?This needs to be rebased for the latest kernel. Which looks like this: MACHINE_START(U8500, "ST-Ericsson MOP500 platform") /* Maintainer: Srinidhi Kasagar [off-list ref] */ .atag_offset = 0x100, .map_io = u8500_map_io, .init_irq = ux500_init_irq, /* we re-use nomadik timer here */ .timer = &ux500_timer, .init_machine = mop500_init_machine, MACHINE_END MACHINE_START(HREFV60, "ST-Ericsson U8500 Platform HREFv60+") .atag_offset = 0x100, .map_io = u8500_map_io, .init_irq = ux500_init_irq, .timer = &ux500_timer, .init_machine = hrefv60_init_machine, MACHINE_END MACHINE_START(SNOWBALL, "Calao Systems Snowball platform") .atag_offset = 0x100, .map_io = u8500_map_io, .init_irq = ux500_init_irq, /* we re-use nomadik timer here */ .timer = &ux500_timer, .init_machine = snowball_init_machine, MACHINE_END So - different .init_machine() calls, needed to simplify the board files as of now. (Patch from Lee Jones.)
But ultimately I would expect that the init_machine calls to be the same with a DT based machine. This goes back to do we add DT to existing boards or create a new clean DT machine and add to it as boards are converted? Rob