On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 02:22:16PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:

On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:14:48PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

quoted

The name will be fixed by the individual device bindings, this is
specifying the general form of a supply property.  Each device binding
will define the set of supplies that the device can use.

Ah, ok. It shouldn't be a part of this binding then and instead be added
to the bindings for the consumers.

I think it's useful to define how consumers are supposed to do this
somewhere - it is actually part of the core binding how consumers are
supposed to do this.

There's also a bit of magic here for chained supplies with one regulator
supplying another (eg, using a DCDC to drop the system supply down to a
lower voltage to supply a bunch of LDOs for improved efficiency).