Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 4 authors, 2011-10-12

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: at_hdmac: platform data move to use .id_table

From: Nicolas Ferre <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-12 16:35:09
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On 10/11/2011 04:16 PM, Vinod Koul :
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 18:37 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
quoted
We remove platform data from DMA controller and move
to the use of .id_table to distinguish between compatible
types. The two implementations allow to determine the
number of channels and the capabilities of the controller.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <redacted>
---
 drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c      |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/dma/at_hdmac_regs.h |    8 +++++++
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
index fcfa0a8..fef57bc 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
@@ -1175,6 +1175,18 @@ static void atc_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
 
 /*--  Module Management  -----------------------------------------------*/
 
+static struct platform_device_id atdma_devtypes[] = {
+	{
+		.name = "at91sam9rl_dma",
+		.driver_data = ATDMA_DEVTYPE_SAM9RL,
+	}, {
+		.name = "at91sam9g45_dma",
+		.driver_data = ATDMA_DEVTYPE_SAM9G45,
+	}, {
+		/* sentinel */
+	}
+};
+
 /**
  * at_dma_off - disable DMA controller
  * @atdma: the Atmel HDAMC device
@@ -1193,18 +1205,32 @@ static void at_dma_off(struct at_dma *atdma)
 
 static int __init at_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct at_dma_platform_data *pdata;
 	struct resource		*io;
 	struct at_dma		*atdma;
 	size_t			size;
 	int			irq;
 	int			err;
 	int			i;
+	u32                     nr_channels;
+	dma_cap_mask_t          cap_mask = {};
+	enum atdma_devtype	atdmatype;
+
+	dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, cap_mask);
+
+	/* get DMA parameters from controller type */
+	atdmatype = platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
 
-	/* get DMA Controller parameters from platform */
-	pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
-	if (!pdata || pdata->nr_channels > AT_DMA_MAX_NR_CHANNELS)
+	switch (atdmatype) {
+	case ATDMA_DEVTYPE_SAM9RL:
+		nr_channels = 2;
+		break;
+	case ATDMA_DEVTYPE_SAM9G45:
+		nr_channels = 8;
+		dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, cap_mask);
+		break;
+	default:
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	io = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 	if (!io)
@@ -1215,14 +1241,15 @@ static int __init at_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return irq;
 
 	size = sizeof(struct at_dma);
-	size += pdata->nr_channels * sizeof(struct at_dma_chan);
+	size += nr_channels * sizeof(struct at_dma_chan);
 	atdma = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!atdma)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	/* discover transaction capabilites from the platform data */
-	atdma->dma_common.cap_mask = pdata->cap_mask;
-	atdma->all_chan_mask = (1 << pdata->nr_channels) - 1;
+	/* discover transaction capabilites */
capabilities
Yes.
quoted
+	atdma->dma_common.cap_mask = cap_mask;
+	atdma->all_chan_mask = (1 << nr_channels) - 1;
+	atdma->devtype = atdmatype;
 
 	size = resource_size(io);
 	if (!request_mem_region(io->start, size, pdev->dev.driver->name)) {
@@ -1268,7 +1295,7 @@ static int __init at_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	/* initialize channels related values */
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&atdma->dma_common.channels);
-	for (i = 0; i < pdata->nr_channels; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_channels; i++) {
 		struct at_dma_chan	*atchan = &atdma->chan[i];
 
 		atchan->chan_common.device = &atdma->dma_common;
@@ -1313,7 +1340,7 @@ static int __init at_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Atmel AHB DMA Controller ( %s%s), %d channels\n",
 	  dma_has_cap(DMA_MEMCPY, atdma->dma_common.cap_mask) ? "cpy " : "",
 	  dma_has_cap(DMA_SLAVE, atdma->dma_common.cap_mask)  ? "slave " : "",
-	  pdata->nr_channels);
+	  nr_channels);
indent?
Well, this dev_info statement seems pretty well indented: if I use a
tab, then I cross the 80 column rule, and I would like to keep the "?:"
operator on one line... So I would like to keep it like this.
quoted
 	dma_async_device_register(&atdma->dma_common);
 
@@ -1495,6 +1522,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops at_dma_dev_pm_ops = {
 static struct platform_driver at_dma_driver = {
 	.remove		= __exit_p(at_dma_remove),
 	.shutdown	= at_dma_shutdown,
+	.id_table	= atdma_devtypes,
 	.driver = {
 		.name	= "at_hdmac",
 		.pm	= &at_dma_dev_pm_ops,
diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac_regs.h b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac_regs.h
index aa4c9ae..d7d6737 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac_regs.h
@@ -248,9 +248,16 @@ static inline struct at_dma_chan *to_at_dma_chan(struct dma_chan *dchan)
 
 /*--  Controller  ------------------------------------------------------*/
 
+enum atdma_devtype {
+	ATDMA_DEVTYPE_UNDEFINED = 0,
+	ATDMA_DEVTYPE_SAM9RL,	/* compatible with SAM9RL DMA controller */
+	ATDMA_DEVTYPE_SAM9G45,	/* compatible with SAM9G45 DMA controller */
+};
+
 /**
  * struct at_dma - internal representation of an Atmel HDMA Controller
  * @chan_common: common dmaengine dma_device object members
+ * @atdma_devtype: identifier of DMA controller compatibility
  * @ch_regs: memory mapped register base
  * @clk: dma controller clock
  * @save_imr: interrupt mask register that is saved on suspend/resume cycle
@@ -260,6 +267,7 @@ static inline struct at_dma_chan *to_at_dma_chan(struct dma_chan *dchan)
  */
 struct at_dma {
 	struct dma_device	dma_common;
+	enum atdma_devtype	devtype;
 	void __iomem		*regs;
 	struct clk		*clk;
 	u32			save_imr;
Little confused at this, where is the remove of existing platfrom data
per the changelog?
Well, yes, it is the use of platform data that is removed, not the
structure it self. I change the log message in my v2 patch series.

thanks, bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help