On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:49:21AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:16:30PM -0700, Anton Staaf wrote:
quoted
With this patch the following property assignment:
property = <0x12345678 'a' '\r' 100>;
is equivalent to:
property = <0x12345678 0x00000061 0x0000000D 0x00000064>
Signed-off-by: Anton Staaf <redacted>
Acked-by: David Gibson <redacted>
So, I *think* we want to wait until the question of size
is resolved some more, right? Or, take this in any event
as "without a type indicator they are all 32-bit values"?
No this patch is fine to take without changing the cell size
semantics. It's just that it becomes a lot more useful when we do get
those.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson