On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:05PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

		regulator = <&regulator1>,<&regulator2>;
		regulator-names = "supply1","supply2";
	};

This syntax is really painful - we're relying on keeping two arrays in
sync which isn't good for legibility or robustness.  I'd expect
something like having a property with the supply name referencing the
regulator node concerned like:

	dbvdd = <&regulator1>;
	dcvdd = <&regulator2>;

or something.  Keeping the two arrays separate doesn't seem great.