Re: Appended devicetree with Torvalds' HEAD
From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-12 12:15:58
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Linus Walleij wrote:quoted
Does anyone happen to run a mainline kernel with zImage-appended device tree? Or: Are there out-of-tree patches required to do this? (I guess so.) And: Do they actually work?They sure do, (or so I hope). My latest patchset is here:
I've tested this a bit now with U8500 and RealView
PB1176.
I'm using the clean patches on a clean tree, i.e.
just relying on the code already in mainline.
We add this to the MACHINE_START()
static const char * realview_dt_board_compat[] = {
"arm,realview-pb1176",
NULL
};
.dt_compat = realview_dt_board_compat,
On kernel 3.1-rc4 the system hangs in early boot
(early printk does not help). But this is not related to
these patches at all, it happens as soon as you enable
CONFIG_USE_OF. (Any hints on how to fix that?)
So I tested a bit with just a plain v3.0 kernel.
Using the "supplementing DTB with traditional ATAG data"
patch totally hangs my systems, even if I don't enable
CONFIG_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT, so I think that patch
needs some scrutiny.
Removing that patch the system boots, and I can use
CONFIG_USE_OF with CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE
to inspect an empty tree in /proc/device-tree
If I then try to enable these patches it dies
by not finding any "compatible" property. (But it boots,
yay!)
Error: unrecognized/unsupported device tree compatible list:
[ ]
Available machine support:
ID (hex) NAME
ffffffff ARM-RealView PB1176
Please check your kernel config and/or bootloader.
(I know the MACHINE_TYPE isn't sane.)
Anyway, so the
prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(dt_root, "compatible", &size);
returns NULL.
So it appears that the appended device tree does not
show up.
I don't quite know how to debug this further...
Given that the appended approach is generally
frowned upon maybe we are better off trying to fix
our U-Boot, getting a combo that is known to work
with device tree, than trying to get appended device
trees to work?
Yours,
Linus Walleij